Browse the full index of
Listen With Reason columns

Why a column like this? Because too many web sites seem
devoid of personality. Because the world of newspaper design can
always use a little more dialogue. And because, hey, it's my web
site. So I thought, why not create the first regular online column
about newspaper design, on the first web site devoted to newspaper
design? Why "Listen With Reason?" Because "Listen to
..." sounded a little too preachy.
Back to home page: www.ronreason.com (more tips
on newspaper design, graphics and editing).
|
|
[Note: This column was published in the Spring 2002
issue of the Society for News Design's "Design"
magazine.]
In recent years my e-mail inbox has filled up with
inquiries about news design, and I've noticed a distinct trend in
the topics. Some people write to ask the difference between a
broadsheet and a tab, but overwhelmingly, people write for advice on
which fonts to use, specifically for body text. Imagine my surprise
recently when the following people wrote me with similar questions
in just one 24-hour period. (I swear on my AP Stylebook, all are
real inquiries from the same day.)
"Sir: I am working in the design department of
my newspaper (a leading newspaper overseas). We are going to change
the look of the paper into a new size, wherein we want some changes
in our body fonts and headline fonts as well. Right now we are using
Adobe's Postscript Font, Times Ten, at size 8.8 on leading 9.1 with
-3 kerning for the body text. Can you suggest some fonts that have
more x-height than the above mentioned font, and can be used as a
body font on a reduced 8-column size wherein the paper's width
reduces from 38.5 cm to 32.9cm?"
* * * "Hi Ron - I write to ask your opinion on
readability of point size, specifically our new photo-byline
style... 6.5 point Franklin Gothic. I am researching the standards
and requisites of readability and would appreciate any websites you
may know that discuss such issues. Thanks for your time."
* * * "Ron: We are a small weekly newspaper that is
converting to the narrow web. We do not have the resources of a
large design team, but we need typefaces that are classy, but
readible. Can you make any recommendations for both headlines and
body copy? Currently, we are using Times Roman, New Century
Schoolbook and Helvetica. We are considering Miller for body copy
and Franklin Gothic for headlines. Also, how much variety should
there be in a newspaper? In other words, should classifieds use the
same text as the news pages? What about feature pages and news
pages? What about headline styles? Any help would be appreciated."
I'll share with readers of this column the response I generally send
to questions like this. Not to be coy about the mystery or art of
selecting body text (or headline) faces, but it's not an easy (or
totally appropriate) question, and one that I no longer think is
helpful to address in a generic context.
In a full-scale redesign, weeks of testing and assessment are often
involved in the selection of typefaces. The success of their use
depends so much on a number of factors, including, obviously, the
intrinsic characteristics of the text styling - weight, point size,
tracking/kerning, leading.
Then take into account complementary design elements on the page -
the visual relationship of the text in question to the multitude of
other fonts used nearby for captions, headlines, subheads, labels,
etc., not to mention non-text elements such as white space, rule
lines, dingbats, etc. (You also want to consider what fonts your
competitors might be using - you don't want to look too much like
them!) Third, you have a multitude of technical issues - quality
of paper and ink being used, age and type of presses used for
printing, the number of words per line and per inch desired by the
editors, hyphenation and justification allowed by your grid. And
finally (and here's a big one) there's the mood of the editor who
inevitably views his or her options for typography and decrees,
without further articulation, "I like it" or "I don't like it."
Certainly, I feel comfortable saying I have used or admired Century,
Poynter, Nimrod, Optima, Miller, or other fonts in my design work.
And in the past, I have recommended fonts and other design elements
in a generic context (seminars or other workshops present many
pitfalls for the givers and seekers of such blanket advice).
However, sometimes I have later picked up the paper in question and
find a typeface used, poorly, by editors who didn't understand not
to squeeze it too much, or use it in conjunction with a weak
medium-weight sans serif for captions, or whatever.
I liken this syndrome to dispensing psychological advice for free -
something to be very wary of! Once all the above is stated, I think
the best advice I can give is this:
1) Ask around to see what others are using. 2)
Experiment, experiment, experiment. Try many variations, and look at
the whole picture - test the type in conjunction with real elements
that it will later be published with - and you'll be at least a
little bit closer to making a sound decision.
* * *
That very day I also received the following inquiry:
"Mr. Reason: I would like to make an MS Word file look as much like
a newspaper as possible. Can you point me to any basic style rules
that would help?"
Sorry, the doctor is OUT!
Want to share your own experiences in type exploration? Anecdotes
about how editors perceived your typographic choices?
Email me and IÕll share
responses online or in a future column.
 Back to top of
page
|
|

Special thanks to Rick
Nease/Detroit Free Press, for the illustration above.

Don't forget to peruse today's front pages from around the globe, in
Live Newspaper
Pages Online, updated regularly! (The link has moved, but go
here to change your bookmark.)
|