Design With Reason: The "Listen With Reason" Column 06.08.01
Bio/Contact | About Redesigns | Skills Training & Leadership Consulting | Tips, Articles, Resources | Calendar | Home

Full index of past "Listen With Reason" columns




Browse the full index of recent Listen With Reason columns



Why a column like this? Because too many web sites seem devoid of personality. Because the world of newspaper design can always use a little more dialogue. And because, hey, it's my web site. So I thought, why not create the first regular online column about newspaper design, on the first web site devoted to newspaper design? Why "Listen With Reason?" Because "Listen to ..." sounded a little too preachy.



Back to home page:
www.ronreason.com
(more tips on newspaper design, graphics and editing).


This installment of "Listen With Reason" is published simultaneously in the Summer 2001 edition of Design, the (print) journal of the Society of News Design. This issue, shown at right, is largely devoted to dialogue about the SND contest. Have feedback? Email me here and I'll consider responses for a future online column.

* * *
Tired of complaining about the SND competition? Weary of having to explain to the newsroom troops why their brilliant (yet poorly reproduced) food section on "cooking the perfect turkey" didn't win a prize? Just darn sick of seeing the same old papers (curses, El Mundo!!!) haul home the same old awards?
Well, don't just sit there, do something! Join my crusade to reform the annual design competition! "Best Designed Newspaper" ... who cares? How about "Most Readable School Lunch Menus and Movie Listings?"
OK, so that last one may not get your blood pumping, but here are some other categories that I think (seriously) could breathe new life into our culture, if only we could figure out a way to identify, and reward, the winners:

Most Transformed or Enlightened Newsroom Culture
It would be tempting to confuse this with a redesign category but that's not the intent. (Let's face it - some redesigns simply change the headline font or reduce the web width and call it a day, without really improving the "spirit" of the place.) This award would single out the newsroom that has done the most noticeable about-face within the previous year, and for whatever reason, has started to respect and produce visuals in a new, powerful way. Perhaps a new editor or art director has come on board to guide the way, a veteran staffer has "seen the light" after attending a design workshop, a new stylebook has suddenly instilled discipline and clarity on the organization, or, God forbid, a newsroom training program has made a difference within the last year.

Best Newsroom Spirit
This award goes to the newsroom where all designers and copy editors feel a part of the process, reporters clue artists in about the precise meaning of their stories as early as possible, and the result is that everyone feels good about going to work each day. (Note to contest strategists: this is likely to be the least crowded field.)

Best Use of Limited Resources (or "Best Use of a Stingy Newshole or Lousy Budget")
This award goes to the newspaper, regardless of size, that makes the most enterprising use of extremely limited resources. The winners here might make use of illustrations created quickly out of household scraps, studio photos taken in a flash using props bought on lunchtime, and handout visuals brought back from the field by reporters.

Best "Simple Idea"
Related to the above, this award goes to the one visual solution that resisted the use of bombastic fireworks or Photoshop effects and instead, relied on an innovative concept that excels in its clarity and simplicity. (New to this site and need "simple" inspiration? Click here.)

Best Example of Teamwork in Presentation (or, "We Couldn't Have Done It Without You")
Entries must have been created by three or more players, and must include one or more people from the "word side." Perhaps this could include deadline and non-deadline categories; the coordinator of the team gets a Golden Maestro Baton or a free trip to Poynter's next WED seminar.

Best Visual Advocacy for the Reader
This award recognizes the overall layout or package that actually helped readers live their lives - perhaps a detailed graphic showing how to navigate around major downtown construction, a photo essay exposing a slumlord, or a food page that actually details how to eat nutritiously and economically for a week or a month. Must include a notarized testimonial from one or more readers (as if the contest isn't already tricky enough to enter correctly!).

Best Stylebook
Few papers have done them well, but stylebooks can create clarity, set standards, and focus precious resources toward creating true visual journalism. Which paper has invested the time to create a stylebook that actually explains every possible typographic style clearly, outlines the underlying philosophies, and includes clear visuals showing their proper application to the paper? Must explain principles for using the grid, white space, rules, boxes and dingbats. (This could be the least sexiest category possible, but perhaps one of the most deserving of an award.)

The "Their Heart Was in the Right Place" Award
This goes to the great package that really did serve readers, either enlightening or entertaining or both, where headlines sang and visuals rocked, but the printing might have been sub-par, or the lettering of the section nameplate might be out-dated, or the main headline font is out of vogue but, alas, the best thing an old pagination system has to offer (you know, the things that are pretty much out of the hands of the individual page designer).

The "Oh My God! You Killed Readability! You Bastards!" Award
(Particularly suitable for the era of shrinking web widths.) Last but not least, how about an award of demerit, for the editor or publisher who absolutely insists that their paper's body text be bastardized with a 65% horizontal scale, or -15 tracking, in order to retain the same words-per-line count they had before shrinking the page width, or cutting the newshole to make this year's profit margin?
(Sorry, couldn't resist that last one.)

* * *
What the heck, let's not wait for the inevitably drawn-out process of reform. If you have strong nominees for any of the above categories, feel free to just mail them directly to me, at 540 W. Aldine Ave. Ste. E, Chicago IL 60657, or email a JPG image here. Though it may not help with that newsroom promotion, and I won't be handing out certificates at an annual conference, honorees may find their work shared for the world on this web site. It could happen!

* * *
Does it matter that newspapers take chances? Why not just play it straight? Send your thoughts, especially about the four case studies published on poynter.org, to design@ronreason.com. Comments may be used in future online columns.

Back to top of page



News Design Poll
May topic: Does your newsroom allow visual risks?

Yes. We encourage taking chances and "thinking out of the box."
No. Our visual approach is conservative and "by the book."


Results

Tell A Friend About This Site
 Email To:

Don't forget to check out who's on the move in News Design People, updated regularly!
Full index of past "Listen With Reason" columns

Bio/Contact | About Redesigns | Skills Training & Leadership Consulting | Tips, Articles, Resources | Calendar | Home

Web posted: June 8, 2001.
design@ronreason.com